<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Firegeezer - Latest Comments in Innovations In Fire Extinguisher Design</title><link>http://firegeezer.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://firegeezer.disqus.com/innovations_in_fire_extinguisher_design/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:47:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Innovations In Fire Extinguisher Design</title><link>http://firegeezer.com/2008/01/30/innovations-in-fire-extinguisher-design/#comment-20151715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks odd.  I read the extra material included in the linked site.  I would love to have a chance to try one of these out.  There have been many things that people have laughed at that turned out to be great inventions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fire Gear Repair Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:47:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Innovations In Fire Extinguisher Design</title><link>http://firegeezer.com/2008/01/30/innovations-in-fire-extinguisher-design/#comment-20151714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It looks like you could play marbles to put the fire out too.  I have had to use an extinguisher several times and have never had any problems with a good old fashioned dry-chem.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Magic Man</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>